[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Registration::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
:: Volume 14, Issue 50 (spring 2023) ::
- 2023, 14(50): 59-78 Back to browse issues page
Analysis of the Umayyad Discourse after the Karbala Incident Based on the Theory of Laclau and Mouffe
Zohreh Safaei Mohammadabadi1 , Farinaz Houshiyar 2, Feyzollah Bushasb Goosheh3
1- PhD student, Department of History, Najafabad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Najafabad, Iran; Lecturer of Islamic studies.
2- Assistant Professor, Department of History, Najafabad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Najafabad, Iran (corresponding author). , hooshyar_farinaz@yahoo.com
3- Assistant Professor, Department of History, Najafabad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Najafabad, Iran.
Abstract:   (445 Views)
The disagreement and lack of conformity between the Umayyad and Ahl al-Bayt factions after Karbala event increased the grounds for discursive confrontation in both speech and action dimensions. This led, on the one hand, to a change in the dominant discourse structure of the Umayyads and, on the other hand, to a deepening of the achievements of the Karbala uprising. The aim of this study is to provide answers to the following questions, while presenting the Umayyad actions in facing Karbala, using the discourse theory of Laclau and Mouffe which considers the dimensions of discourse as both speech and behavior: “What are the reasons for the change in the dominant discourse of the two opposing factions?”, and “What strategies does the dominant discourse adopt to overcome this challenge?” The findings of the research show that the confusion of the stability of the meaning of the Umayyad discourse in a competitive environment with the Ahl al-Bayt discourse after Karbala caused the unrest of the Umayyad discourse and a change of practice from the dominant discourse to the discourse of interaction and appeasement in order to overcome the challenges of the threatened rule.
Keywords: Actions of the Umayyads, Ahl al-Bayt Discourse, Karbala Prisoners, Laclau and Mouffe's Discourse Theory.
Full-Text [PDF 274 kb]   (190 Downloads)    

Received: 2021/05/30 | Accepted: 2021/11/22 | Published: 2023/04/25
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA


XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Safaei Mohammadabadi Z, Houshiyar F, Bushasb Goosheh F. Analysis of the Umayyad Discourse after the Karbala Incident Based on the Theory of Laclau and Mouffe. - 2023; 14 (50) :59-78
URL: http://tarikh.maaref.ac.ir/article-1-1572-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 14, Issue 50 (spring 2023) Back to browse issues page
فصلنامه علمی تاریخ فرهنگ و تمدن اسلامی The History of Islamic Culture and Civilization A Quarterly Research Journal
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.08 seconds with 38 queries by YEKTAWEB 4642