|
Opinions in as-Sahih min Sirat-in-Nabi
|
Hamid Jalilian   1, Seyyed Mohammadali Ayazi2 |
1- Ph.d. degree of Quranic studies from Tehran SRBIAU. , jalilian1358@yahoo.com
2- Assistant professor in SRBIAU. |
|
|
Abstract: (2547 Views) |
Analytical method has been known to be one of the most important methods in studying people`s manner of life. In the method, scientific principles and the norms for historical critique are used. One main work in the field has been known to be that of Seyyed J`afar Morteza Ameli, as-Sahih min Sirat-in-Nabi, in which scientific norms have been given to distinguish right traditions from the weak ones. In this paper, Ameli`s incompatibilities in the book have been extracted and classified with some examples of each class. The incompatibilities may be classified in the method of evaluation, judging on people, commenting the holy verse or historical text and finding the date of events. |
|
| Keywords: Incompatibility, critique of historical traditions, Seyyed J`afar Morteza Ameli, as-Sahih min Sirat-in-Nabi al-A`azam. |
|
|
Full-Text [PDF 255 kb]
(821 Downloads)
|
Received: 2019/10/12 | Accepted: 2019/10/12 | Published: 2019/10/12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Send email to the article author |
|
|
|
| Add your comments about this article |
|
|
|
