[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Registration::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
:: Volume 14, Issue 53 (Winter 2024) ::
- 2024, 14(53): 95-116 Back to browse issues page
A critical study of the claim that head and neck nudity was not distasteful in the days of the Prophet (Based on Quranic foundations and historical evidence)
Mohammad Reza Shah Sanai 1, Nematollah Safari Forushani2
1- Assistant Professor, Shahid Mahalati Higher Education Complex, Qom. (Corresponding author) , mohammadshahsanaiee@gmail.com
2- Professor of Ahl al-Bayt History Department, Islamic History and Civilization Complex affiliated to Al-Mustafa Al-Alamiya University.
Abstract:   (804 Views)
The theory of "minimum hijab" is based on the theory of "minimum divine command" to reduce the moral disgrace of not wearing Islamic veil. The delay in the revelation of the verses related to hijab, naked circumambulation, the pilgrims dress in Hajj rituals, the nudity of companions and the lack of response of Islamic law to nudity are among the arguments of the defenders of this point of view. This research has investigated and refuted their reasons using the method of critical analysis and using library resources, including the construction works and expressions of the owners of this opinion. The findings of the research indicate that nudity, including complete nudity and the nudity of women's head, neck, and hair, is ugly and led to reaction  of the Holy Quran and the Messenger of God. has been looking for In the early years of the Prophethood and in the Meccan verses, the Qur'an reacted to complete nudity and declared it forbiden (haram), and in order to correct the shortcomings of women's clothing (body covering and the size of virtues), verses 31 Noor and 59 Ahzab were also revealed. It seems that the connection between the ugliness of head and neck nudity and women's hair and obscenity is of the "generality and peculiarity in some respect" type, and not "absolute generality and peculiarity"; This means that only some of the women who, knowing the ruling of the Shari'ah and its ugliness, expose their hair, neck, and head, are classified as indecency, and those who do not do this out of awareness, etc., are not classified as indecency.
Keywords: Minimal hijab, nudity, ugliness, Prophet's age, Quranic foundations.
Full-Text [PDF 1298 kb]   (287 Downloads)    

Received: 2023/02/24 | Accepted: 2023/10/31 | Published: 2024/10/14
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA


XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Shah Sanai M R, Safari Forushani N. A critical study of the claim that head and neck nudity was not distasteful in the days of the Prophet (Based on Quranic foundations and historical evidence). - 2024; 14 (53) :95-116
URL: http://tarikh.maaref.ac.ir/article-1-1946-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 14, Issue 53 (Winter 2024) Back to browse issues page
فصلنامه علمی تاریخ فرهنگ و تمدن اسلامی The History of Islamic Culture and Civilization A Quarterly Research Journal
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.06 seconds with 38 queries by YEKTAWEB 4657